Bible History Online
Smith's Bible Dictionary
Mark, Gospel of
1. By whom written. --The author of this Gospel has been universally believed to be Mark or Marcus, designated in Ac 12:12,25; 15:37 as John Mark, and in ch. 5,13 as John.
2. When is was written. --Upon this point nothing absolutely certain can be affirmed, and the Gospel itself affords us no information. The most direct testimony is that of Irenaeus, who says it was after the death of the apostles Peter and Paul. We may conclude, therefore, that this Gospel was not written before A.D. 63. Again we may as certainly conclude that it was not written after the destruction of Jerusalem, for it is not likely that he would have omitted to record so remarkable a fulfillment of our Lord's predictions. Hence A.D. 63-70 becomes our limit, but nearer than this we cannot go. --Farrar.
3. Where it was written. --As to the place, the weight of testimony is uniformly in favor of the belief that the Gospel was written and published at Rome. In this Clement, Eusebius, Jerome, Epiphanius, all agree. Chrysostom, indeed, asserts that it was published at Alexandria; but his statement receives no confirmation, as otherwise it could not fail to have done, from any Alexandrine writer. --Farrar.
4. In what language. --As to the language in which it was written, there never has been any reasonable doubt that it was written in Greek.
5. Sources of information. --Mark was not one of the twelve; and there is no reason to believe that he was an eye and ear witness of the events which he has recorded but an almost unanimous testimony of the early fathers indicates Peter as the source of his information. The most important of these testimonies is that of Papias, who says, "He, the Presbyter (John), said, Mark, being the Interpreter of Peter, wrote exactly whatever he remembered but he did not write in order the things which were spoken or done by Christ. For he was neither a hearer nor a follower of the Lord, but, as I said, afterward followed Peter, who made his discourses to suit what was required, without the view of giving a connected digest of the discourses of our Lord. Mark, therefore, made no mistakes when he wrote down circumstances as he recollected them; for he was very careful of one thing, to omit nothing of what he heard, and to say nothing false in what he related." Thus Papias writes of Mark. This testimony is confirmed by other witnesses. --Abbott.
6. For whom it was written. --The traditional statement is that it was intended primarily for Gentiles, and especially for those at Rome. A review of the Gospel itself confirms this view.
7. Characteristics. -- (1) Mark's Gospel is occupied almost entirely with the ministry in Galilee and the events of the passion week. It is the shortest of the four Gospels, and contains almost no incident or teaching which is not contained in one of the other two synoptists; but (2) it is by far the most vivid and dramatic in its narratives, and their pictorial character indicates not only that they were derived from an eye and ear witness, but also from one who possessed the observation and the graphic artistic power of a natural orator such as Peter emphatically was. (3) One peculiarity strikes us the moment we open it, --the absence of any genealogy of our Lord. This is the key to much that follows. It is not the design of the evangelist to present our Lord to us, like St. Matthew as the Messiah, "the son of David and Abraham," ch. 1:1, or, like St. Luke, as the universal Redeemer, "the son of Adam, which was the son of God." ch. 3:38. (4) His design is to present him to us as the incarnate and wonder-working Son of God, living and acting among men; to portray him in the fullness of his living energy. --Cambridge Bible for Schools.
Smith, William, Dr "Meaning and Definition for 'mark, gospel of' in Smiths Bible Dictionary". bible-history.com - Smith's
; 1901. Copyright Information
© Smith's Bible Dictionary
Smith's Bible Dictionary Home
Bible History Online Home
Bible Encyclopedia (ISBE)
Online Bible (KJV)
Naves Topical Bible
Smith's Bible Dictionary
Easton's Bible Dictionary
Schaff's Bible Dictionary
Fausset's Bible Dictionary
Matthew Henry Bible Commentary
Hitchcock's Bible Dictionary
Related Bible History
Popular and Trending:
Definition of Pharaoh, Who Was the Pharaoh of the Exodus, Did God Harden
Pharaoh's Heart, Which Pharaoh Reigned during the Time of Joseph and Moses,
Watches of the Night, What were the Jewish Watches of the Night, What Is the
Meaning of the Fourth Watch, Midnight and the Cock Crowing,
Thorns and Thistles in the Bible, What were the Different Thorns and Thistles,
How Many Different Plants And Trees Had Thorns In the Time of Jesus,
Where Was Nineveh,
Definition and Meaning of Nineveh, Who Were the Assyrians, Which the Syrian King
Made Nineveh Their Capital, Which Palaces Were Nineveh, Did Archaeologists
the meaning of Edom and Idumea, Where the Edomites Descendents of Esau, Was
Herod and Edomite, When was Petra A City of Edom, Why Did the Edomites Fail When
They Attacked Israel After Jerusalem Fell,
Why did Noah send a
Raven? Was The Biblical Raven A Crow, Why Are Raven's Black, What Was the Raven
in the Mosaic Law, Do Raven's Attack the Eyes,
What was a
Crown of Thorns, Which Thorny Shrub or Plant Was the Crown of Thorns Made from,
What Color Was the Crown of Thorns, in Matthew 27:29 Why did the Roman soldiers
mock Jesus using a Crown of Thorns,
What was a Gergesenes, Where Was Gadara And What Is the Modern Name, Where Was
the Place That Jesus Healed the Two Demon Possessed Man, What Is the Meaning of
Gadarenes, What Is a Demoniac,
What were the
10 Plagues, What Does the Bible Say about Each of the 10 Plagues, Did God Use
the 10 Plagues to Mock the Gods of Egypt, in Exodus 3-12 How Are the Plagues
Described, Was the Passover Part of the 10th Plague,
Where was Zoar, What Is
the Biblical Meaning of okaythe Land of Zoar, Has Zoar Been Discovered, Where
Was Zoar in Relation to Sodom and Gomorrah