of the Pharisees
During the time of Zerubbabel and Ezra there was a clear call to
separation from foreigners and anything unclean. Some verses that clearly
indicate separation during this time period is:
Ezra 6:21 "Then the children of Israel who had returned from the captivity
ate together with all who had separated themselves from the filth of the nations
of the land in order to seek the LORD God of Israel."
Neh 9:2 "Then those of Israelite lineage separated themselves from all
foreigners; and they stood and confessed their sins and the iniquities of their
Although it is not absolutely clear when the name of "Pharisees" had
actually been given to a religious group within Judaism, it seems like during
these early times there were those who had intended to preserve the Law by
having a stricter view of uncleanness, not only from the uncleanness of the
heathen but from that with which they believed had affected the great portion of
As the priests and scribes were attempting to determine the inner development of
Judaism after the captivity they apparently became more and more separated from
the ways of the foreigners as the Lord had prescribed.
Sometime during the Maccabean period, groups within Judaism had sharply
contrasted with each other and two religious parties were developed from them.
The Sadducean party came from the ranks of the priests, the party of the
Pharisees from the scribes. The Pharisees were more concerned with legal issues
and the Sadducees with their social position.
It appears that during the Greek period, the chief priests and rulers of the
people began to neglect the law; the Pharisees united themselves and became an
association that made a duty of the law's meticulous observance.
They appear in the time of John Hyrcanus (135-105 B.C.) under the name of
"Pharisees," no longer on the side of the Maccabees but in hostile opposition to
them, because the Maccabeans' chief concern was no longer the carrying out of
the law but extending their own political power.
The Pharisees had won the favor of the nation, and even Queen Alexandra,
recognizing religious authority and seeking her own peace for her people,
abandoned the power to the Pharisees even though Alexander Jannaeus had tried to
exterminate them with the sword. This was a major turning point which brought
the whole conduct of internal affairs into their hands. All the decrees of the
Pharisees put away by Hyrcanus were reintroduced, and they completely ruled the
public life of the nation. This continued for generations to come.
Even with the changes of government under the Romans and Herodians the Pharisees
maintained their spiritual authority. Although the Sadducean high priests were
at the head of the Sanhedrin, the decisive influence upon public affairs was in
the hands of the Pharisees.
This is an interesting quote from Emil Schurer:
"They had the bulk of the nation as their ally, and women especially were in
their hands. They had the greatest influence upon the congregations, so that all
acts of public worship, prayers, and sacrifices were performed according to
their injunctions. Their sway over the masses was so absolute that they could
obtain a hearing even when they said anything against the king or the high
priest, consequently they were the most capable of counteracting the design of
the kings. Hence, too, the Sadducees, in their official acts, adhered to the
demands of the Pharisees, because otherwise the multitude would not have
-Schurer, History of the Jewish People in the Time of Christ, Part. 2, 2:28).
Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, July 1987..
The Pharisees - Jewish
Leaders in the New Testament.
"Pharisee" is from a Greek word (pharisaios) taken from the Heb/Aramaic
"Perisha" meaning "Separated one." In the time of Jesus the Pharisees were one of
the three chief Jewish sects, the others were the Sadducees and the Essenes. Of
the three, the Pharisees were the most separated from the ways of the foreign
influences that were invading Judaism, and from the ways of the common Jewish
people in the land.
"There was probably no town or village inhabited by Jews which had not its
Pharisees, although they would, of course, gather in preference about Jerusalem
with its Temple, and what, perhaps would have been even dearer to the heart of a
genuine Pharisee--its four hundred and eighty synagogues, its Sanhedrims (great
and small), and its schools of study. There could be no difficulty in
recognising such an one. Walking behind him, the chances were, he would soon halt to
say his prescribed prayers. If the fixed time for them had come, he would stop
short in the middle of the road, perhaps say one section of them, move on, again
say another part, and so on, till, whatever else might be doubted, there could
be no question of the conspicuousness of his devotions in market-place or
corners of streets. There he would stand, as taught by the traditional law, would
draw his feet well together, compose his body and clothes, and bend so low "that
every vertebra in his back would stand out separate," or, at least, till "the
skin over his heart would fall into folds" (Ber. 28 b). The workman would drop
his tools, the burden-bearer his load; if a man had already one foot in the
stirrup, he would withdraw it. The hour had come, and nothing could be suffered to
interrupt or disturb him. The very salutation of a king, it was said, must
remain unreturned; nay, the twisting of a serpent around one's heel must remain
– Alfred Edersheim
Origin and History
The sect of Pharisees is thought to have originated in the 3rd century B.C.,
in days preceding the Maccabean wars, when under Greek domination and the Greek
effort to Hellenize the Jews, there was a strong tendency among the Jews to
accept Greek culture with its pagan religious customs. The rise of the Pharisees
was a reaction and protest against this tendency among their fellow kinsmen.
Their aim was to preserve their national integrity and strict conformity to Mosaic
law. They later developed into self-righteous and hypocritical formalists.
Later they were among those who had condemned Jesus to death.
How fearfully the prophecy of destruction that Jesus had foretold was
fulfilled! In a few brief years the Roman legions of the Emperor Titus utterly
destroyed the city and its glorious Temple. Over a million Jews perished in the siege
in a few days, and a hundred thousand more were taken away in captivity.
Without its marvelous Temple, the Jewish religion was forced to take on a new
character, and after the final Jewish rebellion (132 A.D.) all hope of
rebuilding the Temple was lost, and the work of these rabbis took a different
The Mishnah, compiled by the Patriarch Judah (200 A.D.), which is the final
work of these rabbis, began a final work in the history of Jewish scholarship. It
is a monument of Pharisaic scholarship and a testimony to the final triumph of
Pharisaism, which now is compiled into the Talmud which has become synonymous
Jesus and the Pharisees
The Pharisees were the most numerous and influential of the religious sects of
Jesus’ day. The were strict legalists. They stood for the rigid observance of the
letter and forms of the Law, and also for the Traditions. There were some good
men among them, no doubt, but for the most part they were known for their
covetousness, self-righteousness and hypocrisy.
Scribes were copyists of the Scriptures and because of their minute
acquaintance with the Law they became recognized authorities. They were sometimes called
"lawyers." Scribes and Pharisees were the religious leaders of the nation.
The incredible influence of the Pharisees among the masses cannot be mistaken.
The were the most honored in Judaism at the time of Christ. When Christ won
the favor of the people.
"But the great crowd of people went on hearing Him gladly."
The Words spoken by Jesus in Matt 23 constitute the most bitter denunciation
that ever fell from His lips. The enemies of Jesus could not answer Him a word,
nor did anyone ever again dare to ask Him anything. The Pharisees were
unrepentant, hypocritical, and more determined than ever to seek His destruction. In
His final public discourse in the Temple, it was fitting that He should warn His
disciples against the hypocrisy of these corrupt and wicked men. Even while He
denounced their spiritual blindness, ritualism, and wickedness, He wept over
Jerusalem, and ended His discourse with a lamentation, addressed to the beloved
but doomed city which had sinned away its day of opportunity.
The Paradox of the Pharisees
Jesus and the Pharisees
The Paradox of the Pharisees