.php lang="en">
|
The Horror of the Cross Ancients
spoke of crucifixion with horror. Cicero's history reveals a
common loathing of death on the cross. It was the "extreme
and ultimate punishment of slaves" (servitutis extremum
summumque supplicium, Against Verres 2.5.169), the "cruelest
and most disgusting penalty." (crudelissimum taeterrimumque
supplicium, ibid. 2.5. 165.) The Lord
had lived in Roman territory where crucifixion was all too
familiar. This extreme punishment was Rome's method of
subjugation, as Josephus' account of troubled Palestine
repeatedly demonstrates. When rebellion arose in Jerusalem
after the death of Herod the Great, the governor of Syria
marched his legions through Galilee to Jerusalem and ordered
2,000 rebels to the cross. (Antiquities 17:295.) When Palestine became Roman territory the cross was introduced as a form of punishment, more particularly for those who could not prove their Roman citizenship; later on it was reserved for thieves and malefactors. The punishment of the cross was also regularly inflicted for crimes such as highway robbery and piracy, for public accusation of his master by a slave, for a vow made against his masters prosperity, and for sedition and tumult. According to Roman custom, the penalty of crucifixion was always preceded by scourging; after this preliminary punishment, the condemned person had to carry the cross, or at least the transverse beam of it, to the place of execution, exposed to the taunts and insults of the people. On arrival at the place of execution the criminal on his cross was lifted up. Soon the sufferer, entirely naked, was bound to it with cords. He was then fastened with nails to the wood of the cross. Finally, a placard called the titulus bearing the name of the condemned man and his sentence, was placed at the top of the cross." Cicero's
history
|