Contents | Index
Conclusion
The Paradox of the Pharisees
It was a tragic denunciation that Jesus had pronounced upon the Pharisees, yet
in God’s foreknowledge he planned that His Son would be rejected and die as a common
criminal. This death would bring the ultimate plan of God into reality where He
would offer the great salvation by the offering of His own Son as a sacrifice
for all sin for all time.
In all of the Pharisaic hypocrisy and greed of the day we must not allow our
view to become obscured not only from the good aspects of Pharisaism but also
its true character and significance. Pharisaism was admirable in its attempt,
however futile, to bring every area of life into subjection to the law.
Perhaps more important than the miserable failure of its legalism was the
wellspring of piety that motivated the whole phenomenon known as Pharisaism. It was
the longing for a righteous Israel and the hope of the coming Messianic
kingdom that motivated these men. The piety and expectant tone of the Pharisaic
Psalms of Solomon is virtually indistinguishable from that, so highly honored by
Christians, which appears in the poetic utterances of Luke 1 and 2.
God was about to do a great work for His people, and in preparation it was
necessary for the people to turn to the law anew. The scribes and Pharisees
accordingly made the law an influence in the lives of the masses that it had never
before been. Despite all of the failures, it accomplished much. Pharisaism was at
heart, though tragically miscarried, a movement for righteousness. It was this
concern for righteousness that drove the Pharisees to their legalism with such
a passion. Convinced they had attained the righteousness they sought, the
Pharisees became prey to their own self-satisfaction, and unknowingly they rejected
their only hope of righteousness.
Nevertheless this basic drive for righteousness accounts for what may be
regarded as attractive and Biblical both within Pharisaic and rabbinic Judaism.
Later Judaism stands in continuity with Pharisaism and, as might be expected,
displays some of the same vices and virtues. Not without reason did G. F. Moore
write that "Judaism is the monument of the Pharisees" (II, 193) . Exactly for this reason, however, the quarrel between Jesus and
the Pharisees finds its modern counterpart in that between Judaism and the
Gospel.