Ark of the Covenant - Bible History Online

Bible History Online

Sub Categories
Aeschines
Andronicus Rhodius
Apollodorus of Athens
Aspasius
Acacius of Caesarea
Acacius of Caesarea
Acestorides
Achaeus
Achaeus of Eretria
Achaeus of Eretria
Acron
Acrotatus I
Acrotatus II
Acusilaus
Adeimantus
Adrianus
Aedesius
Aeimnestus
Aelianus Tacticus
Aelius Aristides
Aelius Herodianus
Aelius Theon
Aeneas Tacticus
Aenesidemus
Aenesidemus
Aeropus II of Macedon
Aeschines Socraticus
Aeschylus
Aesop
Aetion
Aetius
Agarista
Agariste
Agariste of Sicyon
Agasias
Agasicles
Agathias
Agathinus
Agathocles
Agathocles of Bactria
Agathon
Ageladas
Agesander
Agesilaus I
Agesilaus II
Agesipolis I
Agesipolis II
Agesipolis III
Agis I
Agis II
Agis III
Agis IV
Agoracritus
Agrippa
Agyrrhius
Albinus
Alcaeus
Alcamenes
Alcamenes
Alcetas I of Macedon
Alcibiades
Alcidamas
Alciphron
Alcmaeon of Croton
Alcman
Alcmenes
Alexander Aetolus
Alexander Balas
Alexander Cornelius
Alexander I of Epirus
Alexander II of Epirus
Alexander of Abonuteichos
Alexander of Aphrodisias
Alexander of Greece
Alexander of Pherae
Alexander Polyhistor
Alexander The Great
Alexis
Alypius
Ameinocles
Ameipsias
Amelesagoras
Amelius
Ammonius Grammaticus
Ammonius Hermiae
Ammonius Saccas
Amphis
Amynander
Anacharsis
Anacreon
Anaxagoras
Anaxander
Anaxandrides
Anaxarchus
Anaxidamus
Anaxilas
Anaxilas of Rhegium
Anaxilaus
Anaximander
Anaximenes of Lampsacus
Anaximenes of Miletus
Andocides
Andriscus
Andron
Andron
Andronicus of Cyrrhus
Andronicus of Cyrrhus
Andronicus Rhodius
Androsthenes
Androtion
Anniceris
Anonymus
Anser
Antalcidas
Anthemius of Tralles
Antigenes
Antigonus II Gonatas
Antigonus III Doson
Antigonus III of Macedon
Antigonus of Carystus
Antimachus
Antimachus I
Antinous
Antiochus I Soter
Antiochus II Theos
Antiochus III the Great
Antiochus IV Epiphanes
Antiochus IX Cyzicenus
Antiochus of Ascalon
Antiochus V Eupator
Antiochus VI Dionysus
Antiochus VII Sidetes
Antiochus VIII Grypus
Antiochus X Eusebes
Antiochus XI Ephiphanes
Antiochus XI Ephiphanes
Antiochus XIII Asiaticus
Antipater
Antipater II of Macedon
Antipater of Sidon
Antipater of Tarsus
Antipater of Thessalonica
Antipater of Tyre
Antiphanes
Antiphilus
Antiphon
Antisthenes
Antoninus Liberalis
Antonius Diogenes
Antyllus
Anyte of Tegea
Anytos
Apelles
Apellicon
Apellicon
Apion
Apollocrates
Apollodorus
Apollodorus of Carystus
Apollodorus of Damascus
Apollodorus of Pergamon
Apollodorus of Seleuceia on the Tigris
Apollodotus I
Apollonius
Apollonius Molon
Apollonius of Citium
Apollonius of Perga
Apollonius of Rhodes
Apollonius of Tyana
Apollophanes
Apollos
Appian
Apsines
Araros
Aratus
Arcesilaus
Archedemus of Tarsus
Archelaus
Archelaus I
Archelaus II
Archermus
Archestratus
Archias
Archidamus I
Archidamus II
Archidamus III
Archidamus IV
Archidamus V
Archigenes
Archilochus
Archimedes
Archytas
Arctinus
Aretaeus
Areus I
Areus II
Argas
Arion
Aristaeus
Aristagoras
Aristander of Telmessus
Aristarchus of Samos
Aristarchus of Samothrace
Aristarchus of Tegea
Aristeas
Aristides
Aristides Quintilianus
Aristippus
Aristobulus
Aristocles
Aristodemus
Aristogiton
Aristomenes
Ariston (king of Sparta)
Ariston of Alexandria
Ariston of Ceos
Ariston of Chios
Aristonicus
Aristonymus
Aristophanes
Aristophanes of Byzantium
Aristophon
Aristotle
Aristoxenus
Arius
Arius Didymus
Arrian
Arsinoe I of Egypt
Arsinoe II of Egypt
Arsinoe III of Egypt
Artemidorus
Artemisia
Artemon
Asclepiades
Asclepiodotus
Asius
Aspasia - hetaera
Athenaeus
Athenaeus
Athenagoras of Athens
Athenodorus
Attalus I
Attalus II
Attalus III
Autocrates
Autolycus of Pitane
Avaris
Babrius
Bacchylides
Basil of Caesarea
Basilides
Bathycles of Magnesia
Battus
Berenice I of Egypt
Berenice II of Egypt
Berenice IV of Egypt
Bias of Priene
Bion
Biton
Boethus
Boethus of Sidon
Bolus
Brasidas
Bryson
Bupalus
Cadmus of Miletus
Caecilius of Calacte
Caesarion
Calamis
Calliades
Callias
Callicrates
Callimachus
Callimachus
Callimachus (polemarch)
Callimachus (sculptor)
Callinus
Calliphon
Callippus
Callisthenes
Callistratus
Carcinus (writer)
Carneades
Cassander
Castor of Rhodes
Cebes
Celsus
Cephisodotus
Cercidas
Cercops of Miletus
Chabrias
Chaeremon
Chaeremon of Alexandria
Chaeris
Chamaeleon
Chares of Athens
Chares of Lindos
Chares of Mytilene
Charidemus
Chariton
Charmadas
Charon of Lampsacus
Charondas
Chilon
Chionides
Choerilus
Choerilus of Iasus
Choerilus of Samos
Chremonides
Christodorus
Chrysanthius
Chrysippus
Cimon
Cimon of Cleonae
Cineas
Cinesias
Cleandridas
Cleanthes
Clearchus of Rhegium
Clearchus of Soli
Clearchus of Sparta
Cleidemus
Cleinias
Cleisthenes
Cleisthenes of Sicyon
Cleitarchus
Cleitus
Clement of Alexandria
Cleombrotus I
Cleomedes
Cleomenes I
Cleomenes II
Cleomenes III
Cleomenes of Naucratis
Cleon
Cleonides
Cleonymus
Cleopatra I of Egypt
Cleopatra II of Egypt
Cleopatra III of Egypt
Cleopatra IV of Egypt
Cleopatra Thea
Cleopatra V of Egypt
Cleopatra V of Egypt
Cleopatra VI of Egypt
Cleopatra VII of Egypt
Cleophon
Clitomachus (philosopher)
Colaeus
Colluthus
Colotes
Conon
Conon (mythographer)
Conon of Samos
Corinna
Cosmas Indicopleustes
Crantor
Craterus of Macedon
Crates of Mallus
Crates of Thebes
Cratippus
Cresilas
Critias
Critius
Crito
Critolaus
Croesus
Ctesias
Ctesibius
Cylon
Cynaethus
Cynegeirus
Cynisca
Cypselus
Damascius
Damasias
Damastes
Damocles
Damon of Athens
Damophon
Dares of Phrygia
Deinocrates
Demades
Demaratus
Demetrius I of Bactria
Demetrius I of Syria
Demetrius I Poliorcetes
Demetrius II
Demetrius II of Macedon
Demetrius II of Syria
Demetrius III Eucaerus
Demetrius III Eucaerus
Demetrius of Alopece
Demetrius of Magnesia
Demetrius of Pharos
Demetrius of Scepsis
Demetrius Phalereus
Demetrius the Cynic
Demetrius the Fair
Democedes
Democritus
Demonax
Demonax (lawmaker)
Demosthenes
Demosthenes (general)
Dercyllidas
Dexippus
Diagoras
Diagoras of Rhodes
Dicaearchus
Dictys Cretensis
Didymus Chalcenterus
Didymus the Blind
Didymus the Musician
Dienekes
Dinarchus
Dinocrates
Dinon
Dio Chrysostom
Diocles
Diocles of Carystus
Diocles of Magnesia
Diodorus Cronus
Diodorus Siculus
Diodotus II
Diodotus of Bactria
Diodotus the Stoic
Diodotus Tryphon
Diogenes Apolloniates
Diogenes Laertius
Diogenes of Babylon
Diogenes of Oenoanda
Diogenes of Sinope
Diogenes of Tarsus
Diogenianus
Diomedes
Dion
Dionysius Chalcus
Dionysius of Byzantium
Dionysius of Halicarnassus
Dionysius of Heraclea
Dionysius of Phocaea
Dionysius of Syracuse
Dionysius Periegetes
Dionysius the Areopagite
Diophantus
Dios
Dioscorides
Diotimus
Diphilus
Dorotheus
Dorotheus of Sidon
Dositheus
Draco
Dracon
Duris
Echecrates
Ecphantus
Empedocles
Epaminondas
Ephialtes
Ephialtes of Trachis
Ephippus
Ephorus
Epicharmus of Kos
Epicrates
Epictetus
Epicurus
Epigenes
Epilycus
Epimenides
Epiphanius of Salamis
Epitadeus
Erasistratus
Eratosthenes
Erinna
Eubulides of Miletus
Eubulus (statesman)
Eucleidas
Eucleides
Euclid
Eucratides
Euctemon
Eudamidas I
Eudemus
Eudemus of Rhodes
Eudorus of Alexandria
Eudoxus of Cnidus
Eudoxus of Cyzicus
Euenus
Eugammon
Euhemerus
Eumenes I
Eumenes II
Eumenes of Cardia
Eumenius
Eumolpidae
Eunapius
Eunomus
Euphantus
Euphemus
Euphorion
Euphranor
Euphronius
Eupolis
Euripides
Eurybatus
Eurybiades
Eurycrates
Eurycratides
Eurylochus
Eurymedon
Eurypon
Eurysthenes
Eusebius of Caesarea
Euthydemus
Euthydemus I
Euthydemus II
Euthymides
Eutychides
Evagoras
Execias
Galen
Gelo
Glaphyra - hetaera
Glaucus of Chios
Gorgias
Gorgidas
Gregory Nazianzus
Gregory of Nyssa
Gylippus
Hagnon
Hagnothemis
Harmodius and Aristogeiton
Harpalus
Hecataeus of Abdera
Hecataeus of Miletus
Hecato of Rhodes
Hecatomnus
Hedylus
Hegemon of Thasos
Hegesander
Hegesias of Cyrene
Hegesias of Magnesia
Hegesippus
Hegesistratus
Heliocles
Heliodorus
Hellanicus
Hellanicus of Lesbos
Hephaestion
Hephaistio of Thebes
Heracleides
Heraclides Ponticus
Heraclitus
Hermaeus
Hermagoras
Hermias (philosopher)
Hermias of Atarneus
Hermippus
Hermocrates
Hero of Alexandria
Herodotus
Herophilus
Herostratus
Hesiod
Hesychius of Alexandria
Hicetas
Hiero I of Syracuse
Hiero II of Syracuse
Hierocles of Alexandria
Hippalus
Hipparchus
Hipparchus (son of Pisistratus)
Hippias
Hippias (son of Pisistratus)
Hippocleides
Hippocrates
Hippodamus
Hipponax
Hipponicus
Histiaeus
Homer
Hypatia of Alexandria
Hyperbolus
Hypereides
Hypsicles
Iamblichus (philosopher)
Iambulus
Iasus
Ibycus
Ictinus
Ion of Chios
Iophon
Iphicrates
Irenaeus
Isaeus
Isagoras
Isidore of Alexandria
Isidorus of Miletus
Isocrates
Isyllus
Jason of Pherae
John Chrysostom
Karanus of Macedon
Karkinos
Kerykes
King Nicias
Koinos of Macedon
Lacedaimonius
Laches
Lacydes
Lais of Corinth
Lais of Hyccara
Lamachus
Lamprocles
Lasus of Hermione
Leochares
Leon
Leonidas I
Leonidas II
Leonnatus
Leosthenes
Leotychides
Lesbonax
Lesches
Leucippus
Libanius
Livius Andronicus
Lobon
Longinus
Longus
Lucian
Lycophron
Lycortas
Lycurgus
Lycurgus of Arcadia
Lycurgus of Athens
Lycurgus of Nemea
Lycurgus of Sparta
Lycurgus of Thrace
Lycus
Lydiadas
Lysander
Lysanias
Lysias
Lysimachus
Lysippus
Lysis
Lysistratus
Machaon
Machon
Marcellinus
Marcellus of Side
Marinus
Marsyas of Pella
Maximus of Smyrna
Megacles
Megasthenes
Meidias
Melanippides
Melanthius
Melas
Meleager of Gadara
Melesagoras of Chalcedon
Meletus
Melissus of Samos
Memnon of Rhodes
Menaechmus
Menander
Menander of Ephesus
Menander of Laodicea
Menander the Just
Menecrates of Ephesus
Menedemus (Cynic)
Menedemus of Eretria
Menelaus of Alexandria
Menexenus
Menippus
Meno
Menodotus of Nicomedia
Mentor of Rhodes
Metagenes
Meton
Metrodorus
Metrodorus of Chios
Metrodorus of Lampsacus (the elder)
Metrodorus of Lampsacus (the younger)
Metrodorus of Scepsis
Metrodorus of Stratonicea
Micon
Milo of Croton
Miltiades
Mimnermus
Mindarus
Mnaseas
Mnesicles
Moeris
Moschion (physician)
Moschion (tragic poet)
Moschus
Musaeus
Myia
Myron
Myronides
Myrtilus
Myrtis
Nabis
Nearchus
Nicander
Nicarchus
Nicias
Nicocreon
Nicomachus
Nicomachus of Thebes
Nicomedes I of Bithynia
Nicomedes II of Bithynia
Nicomedes III of Bithynia
Nicomedes IV of Bithynia
Olympias
Olympiodorus of Thebes
Onomacritus
Orestes of Macedon
Origen
Paeonius
Pagondas
Palladas
Pamphilus
Panaetius of Rhodes
Pantaleon
Parmenides
Parmenion
Parrhasius
Paulus Aegineta
Paulus Alexandrinus
Pausanias
Pausanias of Macedon
Pausanias of Sparta
Pedanius Dioscorides
Peisander
Pelopidas
Perdiccas I of Macedon
Perdiccas II of Macedon
Perdiccas III of Macedon
Periander
Pericles
Perseus
Perseus of Macedon
Phaedo of Elis
Phalaris
Pherecydes of Leros
Pherecydes of Syros
Phidias
Phidippides
Philetaerus
Philip I Philadelphus
Philip II of Macedon
Philip II Philoromaeus
Philip III of Macedon
Philip IV of Macedon
Philip V of Macedon
Philistus
Philitas of Cos
Philo
Philochorus
Philolaus
Philoxenos of Eretria
Philoxenus
Phocion
Phocylides
Phormio
Phryne
Phrynichus
Pigres of Halicarnassus
Pindar
Pisistratus
Pittacus of Mytilene
Plato
Pleistarchus
Pleistoanax
Plotinus
Plutarch
Polemo
Polybius
Polycarp
Polycrates
Polydectes
Polydorus
Polygnotus
Polykleitos
Polykleitos
Polyperchon
Porphyry
Posidippus
Posidonius
Pratinas
Praxilla
Praxiteles
Procles
Proclus
Prodicus
Protagoras
Proteas
Prusias I of Bithynia
Prusias II of Bithynia
Prytanis
Ptolemy
Ptolemy I of Egypt
Ptolemy I of Macedon
Ptolemy II of Egypt
Ptolemy III of Egypt
Ptolemy IV of Egypt
Ptolemy IX of Egypt
Ptolemy Philadelphus
Ptolemy V of Egypt
Ptolemy VI of Egypt
Ptolemy VII of Egypt
Ptolemy VIII of Egypt
Ptolemy X of Egypt
Ptolemy XI of Egypt
Ptolemy XII of Egypt
Ptolemy XIII of Egypt
Ptolemy XIV of Egypt
Pyrrho
Pyrrhus of Epirus
Pythagoras
Pytheas
Rhianus
Sappho
Satyros
Satyrus
Scopas
Scopas of Aetolia
Scylax of Caryanda
Seleucus I Nicator
Seleucus II Callinicus
Seleucus III Ceraunus
Seleucus IV Philopator
Seleucus V Philometor
Seleucus VI Epiphanes
Seleucus VII Kybiosaktes
Sextus Empiricus
Simmias
Simonides of Amorgos
Simonides of Ceos
Socrates
Socrates Scholasticus
Solon
Soos
Sophocles
Sophytes
Sosicles (statesman)
Sosigenes
Sosthenes of Macedon
Sostratus
Spartacus
Speusippus
Sporus of Nicaea
Stesichorus
Stesimbrotus
Stilpo
Stobaeus
Strabo
Strato of Lampsacus
Straton of Sardis
Teleclus
Terence
Terpander
Thais
Thales
Thallus
Theagenes of Megara
Theagenes of Rhegium
Theages
Theano
Themistocles
Theocritus
Theodectes
Theodorus of Cyrene
Theodorus of Gadara
Theodorus of Samos
Theodotus of Byzantium
Theognis of Megara
Theon of Alexandria
Theon of Smyrna
Theophilus
Theophrastus
Theopompus
Theopompus
Theramenes
Theron
Thespus
Thessalus
Thibron
Thrasybulus
Thrasyllus
Thrasymachus
Thucydides
Thucydides
Timaeus of Locres
Timaeus of Tauromenium
Timagenes
Timanthes
Timocharis
Timoclea
Timocrates
Timocreon
Timoleon
Timon of Phlius
Timotheus (sculptor)
Timotheus of Athens
Timotheus of Miletus
Triphiodorus or Tryphiodorus
Tyrimmas of Macedon
Tyrtaeus
Ulysses
Xanthippe
Xanthippus
Xenarchus
Xenocles
Xenocrates
Xenocrates of Aphrodisias
Xenophanes
Xenophilus
Xenophon
Xenophon of Ephesus
Zaleucus
Zeno of Citium
Zeno of Elea
Zeno of Sidon
Zenobius
Zenodorus
Zenodotus
Zeuxidamas
Zeuxis and Parrhasius
Zoilus
Zosimas

Back to Categories

July 28    Scripture

People - Ancient Greece: Arius
(AD 250 or 256 – 336) He was a Christian presbyter from Alexandria, Egypt.

Arīus in Harpers Dictionary of Classical Antiquities (Ἄρειος). A celebrated writer and theologian of Alexandria, who denied the eternal divinity and consubstantiality of the Second Person of the Trinity. Though much persecuted for his heresy, he succeeded in winning the favour of the emperor Constantine, and supplanted his great opponent St. Athanasius. When about to enter the cathedral at Constantinople in triumph, he suddenly died, A.D. 336. From him the sect of the Arians gets its name.
http://tiny.cc/5jkuv…


Arius in Wikipedia Arius (AD 250 or 256 – 336) was a Christian presbyter from Alexandria, Egypt. His teachings about the nature of the Godhead, which emphasized the Father's Divinity over the Son, and his opposition to the Athanasian or Trinitarian Christology, made him a controversial figure in the First Council of Nicea, convened by Roman Emperor Constantine in 325 A.D. After Emperor Constantine legalized and formalized the Christianity of the time in the Roman Empire, the newly recognized Catholic Church sought to unify theology. Trinitarian partisans, including Athanasius, used Arius and Arianism as epithets to represent disagreement with co-equal Trinitarianism, a Christology representing the Father and Son (Jesus of Nazareth) as "of one essence" (consubstantial) and coeternal.[1] Although virtually all positive writings on Arius' theology have been suppressed or destroyed[2], negative writings describe Arius' theology as one in which there was a time before the Son of God, where only God the Father existed. Despite concerted opposition, 'Arian', or nontrinitarian Christian churches persisted throughout Europe and North Africa, in various Gothic and Germanic kingdoms, until suppressed by military conquest or voluntary royal conversion between the fifth and seventh centuries. Although "Arianism" suggests that Arius was the originator of the teaching that bears his name, the debate over the Son’s precise relationship to the Father did not begin with him. This subject had been discussed for decades before his advent; Arius merely intensified the controversy and carried it to a Church-wide audience, where other "Arians" such as Eusebius of Nicomedia and Eusebius of Caesarea would prove much more influential in the long run. In fact, some later "Arians" disavowed that moniker, claiming not to have been familiar with the man or his specific teachings.[3] However, because the conflict between Arius and his foes brought the issue to the theological forefront, the doctrine he proclaimed—though not originated by him—is generally labeled as "his". Early life and personality Reconstructing the life and doctrine of Arius has proven to be a difficult task, as none of his original writings survive. Emperor Constantine ordered their burning while Arius was still living,[4] and any that survived this purge were later destroyed by his Orthodox opponents. Those works which have survived are quoted in the works of churchmen who denounced him as a heretic. This leads some—but not all—scholars to question their reliability.[5] Arius was possibly of Libyan descent. His father's name is given as Ammonius. Arius is believed to have been a student at the exegetical school in Antioch, where he studied under Saint Lucian.[6] Having returned to Alexandria, Arius sided with Meletius of Lycopolis in his dispute over the readmission of those who had denied Christianity under fear of Roman torture, and was ordained a deacon under the latter's auspices. He was excommunicated by Bishop Peter of Alexandria in 311 for supporting Meletius,[7] but under Peter's successor Achillas, Arius was readmitted to communion and in 313 made presbyter of the Baucalis district in Alexandria. Although his character has been severely assailed by his opponents, Arius appears to have been a man of personal ascetic achievement, pure morals, and decided convictions. Paraphrasing Epiphanius of Salamis, an opponent of Arius, Catholic historian Warren H. Carroll describes him as "tall and lean, of distinguished appearance and polished address. Women doted on him, charmed by his beautiful manners, touched by his appearance of asceticism. Men were impressed by his aura of intellectual superiority."[8] Arius was accused of being too liberal in his theology and too "loose" with heresy (as defined by his opponents). However, some historians argue that Arius was actually quite conservative,[1] and that he deplored how, in his view, Christian theology was being too freely mixed with Greek paganism.[9] The Arian controversy Arius is notable primarily because of his role in the Arian controversy, a great fourth-century theological conflict that rocked the Christian world and led to the calling of the first ecumenical council of the Church. This controversy centered upon the nature of the Son of God, and his precise relationship to God the Father. Beginnings The historian Socrates of Constantinople reports that Arius ignited the controversy that bears his name when St. Alexander of Alexandria, who had succeeded Achillas as the Bishop of Alexandria, gave a sermon on the similarity of the Son to the Father. Arius interpreted Alexander's speech as being a revival of Sabellianism, condemned it, and then argued that "if the Father begat the Son, he that was begotten had a beginning of existence: and from this it is evident, that there was a time when the Son was not. It therefore necessarily follows, that he [the Son] had his substance from nothing."[10] This quote describes the essence of Arius' doctrine. It is believed that Arius was influenced in his thinking by the teachings of Lucian of Antioch, a celebrated Christian teacher and martyr. In a letter to Patriarch Alexander of Constantinople Arius' bishop, Alexander of Alexandria, wrote that Arius derived his theology from Lucian. The express purpose of Alexander's letter was to complain of the doctrines that Arius was diffusing, but his charge of heresy against Arius is vague and unsupported by other authorities. Furthermore, Alexander's language, like that of most controversialists in those days, is quite vituperative. Moreover, even Alexander never accused Lucian of having taught Arianism; rather, he accused Lucian ad invidiam of heretical tendencies—which apparently, according to him, were transferred to his pupil, Arius.[11] The noted Russian historian Alexander Vasiliev refers to Lucian as "the Arius before Arius".[11] Origen and Arius Like many third-century Christian scholars, Arius was influenced by the writings of Origen, widely regarded as the first great theologian of Christianity.[12] However, while he drew support from Origen's theories on the Logos, the two did not agree on everything. Arius clearly argued that there was a time when the Son did not exist, and that the Logos had a beginning. By way of contrast, Origen taught that the relation of the Son to the Father had no beginning.[13] Arius objected to Origen's doctrine, complaining about it in his letter to the Nicomedian Eusebius, who had also studied under Lucian. Nevertheless, despite disagreeing with Origen on this point, Arius found solace in his writings, which used expressions that favored Arius's contention that the Logos was of a different substance than the Father, and owed his existence to his Father's will. However, because Origen's theological speculations were often proffered to stimulate further inquiry rather than to put an end to any given dispute, both Arius and his opponents were able to invoke the authority of this revered (at the time) theologian during their debate.[14] Initial responses At first, Bishop Alexander seemed unsure of what to do about Arius. The question that Arius was raising had been left unsettled two generations previously; if in any sense it could be said to have been decided, it had been settled in favor of opponents of the homoousion (the idea that the Father, Son and Holy Ghost are of the same exact substance and are co-equally God; the position adopted by the Trinitarians who opposed Arius). Therefore, Alexander allowed the controversy to continue until he ultimately came to believe that it had become dangerous to the peace of the Church. Once he reached this conclusion, he called a local council of bishops and sought their advice. This council decided against Arius and Alexander deposed Arius from his office, excommunicating him and his supporters. Later, Alexander would be criticized for his slow reaction to Arius and the perceived threat posed by his teachings.[15] The First Council of Nicaea But "Arianism" could no longer be contained within the Alexadrian diocese. By the time Bishop Alexander finally acted against his recalcitrant presbyter, Arius's doctrine had spread far beyond his own see; it had become a topic of discussion—and disturbance—for the entire Church. The Church was now a powerful force in the Roman world, with Constantine I having legalized it in 313 through the Edict of Milan. The emperor had taken a personal interest in several ecumenical issues, including the Donatist controversy in 316, and he wanted to bring an end to the Arian dispute. To this end, the emperor sent Hosius, bishop of Córdoba to investigate and, if possible, resolve the controversy. Hosius was armed with an open letter from the Emperor: "Wherefore let each one of you, showing consideration for the other, listen to the impartial exhortation of your fellow-servant." But as the debate continued to rage despite Hosius' efforts, Constantine in AD 325 took an unprecedented step: he called a council to be composed of church prelates from all parts of the empire to resolve this issue, possibly at Hosius' recommendation.[16] All secular dioceses of the empire sent one or more representatives to the council, save for Roman Britain; the majority of the bishops came from the East. Pope Sylvester I, himself too aged to attend, sent two priests as his delegates. Arius himself attended the council, as did his bishop, Alexander. Also there were Eusebius of Caesarea, Eusebius of Nicomedia and the young deacon Athanasius, who would become the champion of the Trinitarian dogma ultimately adopted by the council and spend most of his life battling Arianism. Before the main conclave convened, Hosius initially met with Alexander and his supporters at Nicomedia.[17] The council would be presided over by the emperor himself, who participated in and even led some of its discussions.[18] At this First Council of Nicaea twenty-two bishops, led by Eusebius of Nicomedia, came as supporters of Arius. But when some of Arius's writings were read aloud, they are reported to have been denounced as blasphemous by most participants.[19] Those who upheld the notion that Christ was co-eternal and consubstantial with the Father were led by the young archdeacon Athanasius. Those who instead insisted that the Son of God came after God the Father in time and substance, were led by Arius the presbyter. For about two months, the two sides argued and debated,[20] with each appealing to Scripture to justify their respective positions. Arius maintained that the Son of God was a Creature, made from nothing; and that he was God's First Production, before all ages. And he argued that everything else was created through the Son. Thus, said he, only the Son was directly created and begotten of God; furthermore, there was a time that He had no existence. He was capable of His own free will, said Arius, and thus "were He in the truest sense a son, He must have come after the Father, therefore the time obviously was when He was not, and hence He was a finite being."[21] Arius appealed to Scripture, quoting verses such as John 14:28: "the Father is greater than I". And also Colossians 1:15: "Firstborn of all creation." Thus, Arius insisted that the Son was under God the Father, and not co-equal or co-eternal with Him. According to some accounts in the hagiography of Nicholas of Myra, debate at the council became so heated that at one point, Arius was slapped in the face by the saint (later better known as "Santa Claus").[22] Under Constantine's influence, the majority of the bishops ultimately agreed upon a creed, known thereafter as the Nicene creed. It included the word homoousios, meaning "consubstantial", or "one in essence", which was incompatible with Arius' beliefs.[23] On June 19, 325, council and emperor issued a circular to the churches in and around Alexandria: Arius and two of his unyielding partisans (Theonas and Secundus)[23] were deposed and exiled to Illyricum, while three other supporters—Theognis of Nicaea, Eusebius of Nicomedia and Maris of Chalcedon—affixed their signatures solely out of deference to the emperor. However, Constantine soon found reason to suspect the sincerity of these three, for he later included them in the sentence pronounced on Arius. Exile, return and death The Homoousian party's victory at Nicaea was short-lived, however. Despite Arius's exile and the alleged finality of the Council's decrees, the Arian controversy recommenced at once. When Bishop Alexander died in 327, Athanasius succeeded him, despite not meeting the age requirements for a hierarch. Still committed to pacifying the conflict between Arians and Trinitarians, Constantine gradually became more lenient toward those whom the Council of Nicaea had exiled.[24] Though he never repudiated the council or its decrees, the emperor ultimately permitted Arius (who had taken refuge in Palestine) and many of his adherents to return to their homes, once Arius had reformulated his Christology to mute the ideas found most objectionable by his critics. Athanasius was exiled following his condemnation by the First Synod of Tyre in 335 (though he was later recalled), and the Synod of Jerusalem the following year restored Arius to communion. The emperor directed Alexander of Constantinople to receive Arius, despite the bishop's objections; Bishop Alexander responded by earnestly praying that Arius might perish before this could happen.[25] As it turned out—for whatever reason—one day before the Sunday appointed for Arius to be formally readmitted to communion, he suddenly died.[26] Socrates Scholasticus (a detractor of Arius) described Arius's death as follows: It was then Saturday, and...going out of the imperial palace, attended by a crowd of Eusebian [Eusebius of Nicomedia is meant here] partisans like guards, he [Arius] paraded proudly through the midst of the city, attracting the notice of all the people. As he approached the place called Constantine's Forum, where the column of porphyry is erected, a terror arising from the remorse of conscience seized Arius, and with the terror a violent relaxation of the bowels: he therefore enquired whether there was a convenient place near, and being directed to the back of Constantine's Forum, he hastened thither. Soon after a faintness came over him, and together with the evacuations his bowels protruded, followed by a copious hemorrhage, and the descent of the smaller intestines: moreover portions of his spleen and liver were brought off in the effusion of blood, so that he almost immediately died. The scene of this catastrophe still is shown at Constantinople, as I have said, behind the shambles in the colonnade: and by persons going by pointing the finger at the place, there is a perpetual remembrance preserved of this extraordinary kind of death.[27] Many Nicene Christians asserted that Arius's death was miraculous—a consequence of his allegedly heretical views. Several scholarly studies suggest instead that Arius was actually poisoned by his opponents.[28] Even with its namesake's demise, the Arian controversy was far from over, and would not be settled for decades—or centuries, in parts of the West—to come. Arianism after Arius Immediate aftermath Historians report that Constantine, who had never been baptized as a Christian during his lifetime, was baptized on his deathbed by the Arian bishop, Eusebius of Nicodemia.[29] Constantius II, who succeeded Constantine, was an Arian sympathizer[30] who openly encouraged the Arians by appointing Eusebius of Nicomedia, another sympathizer to Arianism, as Bishop ("Patriarch", in the Eastern Church) of Constantinople. Constantius exiled pro-Nicean prelates, including even Pope Liberius. Divisions appeared within the Arian camp, as Semi-Arians attempted to find a compromise between Arianism and Nicene Trinitarianism. A number of synods were held, and at least fourteen different credal formulations were tried throughout the following years, but none proved successful in resolving the dispute.[31] Athanasius continued his vehement opposition to Arianism, soon to be joined by a trio known to history as the Cappadocian Fathers: SS Basil the Great, Gregory the Theologian and Gregory of Nyssa. These four men articulated a theological alternative to Arianism that came to be accepted as the definitive orthodox dogma on the subject. Following the abortive effort by Julian the Apostate to restore paganism in the empire, the emperor Valens—himself an Arian—renewed the persecution of Nicene hierarchs. However, Valen's successor Theodosius I effectively wiped out Arianism once and for all among the elites of the Eastern Empire through a combination of imperial decree, persecution, and the calling of the Second Ecumenical Council in 381, which condemned Arius anew while reaffirming and expanding the Nicene Creed.[32] This generally ended the influence of Arianism among the non-Germanic peoples of the Roman Empire. Arianism in the West Things went differently in the Western Empire. During the reign of Constantius II, the Arian Gothic convert Ulfilas was consecrated a bishop by Eusebius of Nicomedia and sent to missionize his people. His success ensured the survival of Arianism among the Goths and Vandals until the beginning of the eighth century, when these kingdoms succumbed to their Nicean neighbors or accepted Nicean Christianity. Arians also continued to exist in North Africa, Spain and portions of Italy, until finally suppressed during the sixth and seventh centuries.[33] During the Protestant Reformation, a Polish sect known as the Polish Brethren were often referred to as Arians, due to their rejection of the Trinity.[34] Arianism today A modern English church called the Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church claims to follow Arian teachings, canonizing Arius on June 16, 2006.[35] However, they do not accept the Virgin Birth and bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ,[36] which places them in opposition to Arius himself, who accepted both. Furthermore, their "Arian Catholic Creed"[36] is a modern creation, not an ancient statement of faith. Members of the congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses are sometimes referred to as "modern-day Arians", usually by their opponents.[37] However, the Witnesses differ from Arians by saying that the Son can fully know the Father (something Arius himself denied), and by their denial of literal personality to the Holy Spirit (Arius considered the Holy Spirit to be a person or a high angel, whereas the Witnesses consider the Holy Spirit to be God's divine breath or active force). Arians generally worshipped and prayed to Jesus as God, while the Witnesses, though they do reverence Jesus as God's Son and Messiah, do not give Him the same kind of worship as they give to God the Father.[38] Members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (the "Mormons") are sometimes accused of being Arians by their detractors.[39] However, the Christology of the LDS religion differs in several significant aspects from Arian theology.[40] Arius's doctrine Introduction In explaining his actions against Arius, Alexander of Alexandria wrote a letter to Alexander of Constantinople and Eusebius of Nicomedia (where the emperor was then residing), detailing the errors into which he believed Arius had fallen. According to Alexander, Arius taught: That God was not always the Father, but that there was a period when he was not the Father; that the Word of God was not from eternity, but was made out of nothing; for that the ever-existing God (‘the I AM’—the eternal One) made him who did not previously exist, out of nothing; wherefore there was a time when he did not exist, inasmuch as the Son is a creature and a work. That he is neither like the Father as it regards his essence, nor is by nature either the Father’s true Word, or true Wisdom, but indeed one of his works and creatures, being erroneously called Word and Wisdom, since he was himself made of God’s own Word and the Wisdom which is in God, whereby God both made all things and him also. Wherefore he is as to his nature mutable and susceptible of change, as all other rational creatures are: hence the Word is alien to and other than the essence of God; and the Father is inexplicable by the Son, and invisible to him, for neither does the Word perfectly and accurately know the Father, neither can he distinctly see him. The Son knows not the nature of his own essence: for he was made on our account, in order that God might create us by him, as by an instrument; nor would he ever have existed, unless God had wished to create us.[41] Alexander also refers to Arius's poetical Thalia: God has not always been Father; there was a moment when he was alone, and was not yet Father: later he became so. The Son is not from eternity; he came from nothing.[42] The Logos This question of the exact relationship between the Father and the Son (a part of the theological science of Christology) had been raised some fifty years before Arius, when Paul of Samosata was deposed in 269 for agreeing with those who used the word homoousios (Greek for same substance) to express the relation between the Father and the Son. This term was thought at that time to have a Sabellian tendency, though—as events showed—this was on account of its scope not having been satisfactorily defined.[43] In the discussion which followed Paul's deposition, Dionysius, the Bishop of Alexandria, used much the same language as Arius did later, and correspondence survives in which Pope Dionysius blames him for using such terminology. Dionysius responded with an explanation widely interpreted as vacillating. The Synod of Antioch, which condemned Paul of Samosata, had expressed its disapproval of the word homoousios in one sense, while Bishop Alexander undertook its defense in another. Although the controversy seemed to be leaning toward the opinions later championed by Arius, no firm decision had been made on the subject; in an atmosphere so intellectual as that of Alexandria, the debate seemed bound to resurface—and even intensify—at some point in the future. Arius endorsed the following doctrines about The Son or The Word (Logos, referring to Jesus; see the Gospel of John 1:1): 1. that the Word (Logos) and the Father were not of the same essence (ousia); 2. that the Son was a created being (ktisma or poiema); and 3. that the worlds were created through him, so he must have existed before them and before all time. 4. However, there was a "once" [Arius did not use words meaning "time", such as chronos or aion] when He did not exist, before he was begotten of the Father. The Thalia According to Athanasius, Arius authored a poem called the Thalia ("abundance", "good cheer" or "banquet"): a summary of his views on the Logos.[44] Part of this Thalia is quoted in Athanasius's Four Discourses Against the Arians: "And so God Himself, as he really is, is inexpressible to all. He alone has no equal, no one similar ('homoios'), and no one of the same glory. We call Him unbegotten, in contrast to him who by nature is begotten. We praise Him as without beginning, in contrast to him who has a beginning. We worship Him as timeless, in contrast to him who in time has come to exist. He who is without beginning made the Son a beginning of created things. He produced him as a son for Himself, by begetting him. He [the Son] has none of the distinct characteristics of God's own being ('kat' hypostasis') For he is not equal to, nor is he of the same being ('homoousios') as Him." Also from the Thalia: "At God’s will the Son has the greatness and qualities that he has. His existence from when and from whom and from then—are all from God. He, though strong God, praises in part ('ek merous') his superior". Thus, said Arius, God's first thought was the creation of Jesus Christ, therefore time started with the creation of the Logos or Word in Heaven. In this portion of the Thalia, Arius endeavors to explain the ultimate incomprehensibility of the Father to the Son: "In brief, God is inexpressible to the Son. For He is in himself what He is, that is, indescribable, So that the Son does not comprehend any of these things or have the understanding to explain them. For it is impossible for him to fathom the Father, who is by Himself. For the Son himself does not even know his own essence ('ousia'). For being Son, his existence is most certainly at the will of the Father. What reasoning allows, that he who is from the Father should comprehend and know his own parent? For clearly that which has a beginning is not able to conceive of or grasp the existence of that which has no beginning". Here, Arius explains how the Son could still be God, even if he did not exist eternally: "Understand that the Monad [eternally] was; but the Dyad was not before it came into existence. It immediately follows that, although the Son did not exist, the Father was still God. Hence the Son, not being [eternal] came into existence by the Father’s will, He [the Son] is the Only-begotten God, and this one is alien from [all] others." Extant writings Three surviving letters attributed to Arius are his letter to Alexander of Alexandria,[45] his letter to Eusebius of Nicomedia,[46] and his confession to Constantine.[47] In addition, several letters addressed by others to Arius survive, together with brief quotations contained within the polemical works of his opponents. These quotations are often short and taken out of context, and it is difficult to tell how accurately they quote him or represent his true thinking. Arius' Thalia (literally, "Festivity"), a popularized work combining prose and verse, survives in quoted fragmentary form. The two available references from this work are recorded by his opponent Athanasius: the first is a report of Arius's teaching in Orations Against the Arians, 1:5-6. This paraphrase has negative comments interspersed throughout, so it is difficult to consider it as being completely reliable.[48] The second quotation is found in the document On the Councils of Arminum and Seleucia, pg. 15. This passage is entirely in irregular verse, and seems to be a direct quotation or a compilation of quotations;[49] it may have been written by someone other than Athanasius, perhaps even a person sympathetic to Arius.[50] This second quotation does not contain several statements usually attributed to Arius by his opponents, is in metrical form, and resembles other passages that have been attributed to Arius. It also contains some positive statements about the Son.[51] But although these quotations seem reasonably accurate, their proper context is lost, thus their place in Arius' larger system of thought is impossible to reconstruct.[52]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arius


If you notice a broken link or any error PLEASE report it by clicking HERE
© 1995-2017 Bible History Online





More Bible History