Bible History Online Images & Resource Pages

Categories

Ancient Documents
Ancient Egypt
Ancient Greece
Ancient Israel
Ancient Near East
Ancient Other
Ancient Persia
Ancient Rome
Archaeology
Bible Animals
Bible Books
Bible Cities
Bible History
Bible Names A-G
Bible Names H-M
Bible Names N-Z
Bible Searches
Biblical Archaeology
Childrens Resources
Church History
Evolution & Science
Illustrated History
Images & Art
Intertestamental
Jesus
Languages
Manners & Customs
Maps & Geography
Messianic Prophecies
Museums
Mythology & Beliefs
People - Ancient Egypt
People - Ancient Greece
People - Ancient Near East
People - Ancient Rome
Rabbinical Works
Sites - Egypt
Sites - Israel
Sites - Jerusalem
Societies & Studies
Study Tools
Timelines & Charts
Weapons & Warfare
World History

May 24    Scripture

Bible History Online Submission Page
Bible History OnlineBible History Online Search
Bible History Online Sitemap
About Bible History OnlineBible History Online Help


Easton's Bible Dictionary

 

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z 


Pentateuch
        the five-fold volume, consisting of the first five books of the
        Old Testament. This word does not occur in Scripture, nor is it
        certainly known when the roll was thus divided into five
        portions Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy.
        Probably that was done by the LXX. translators. Some modern
        critics speak of a Hexateuch, introducing the Book of Joshua as
        one of the group. But this book is of an entirely different
        character from the other books, and has a different author. It
        stands by itself as the first of a series of historical books
        beginning with the entrance of the Israelites into Canaan. (See
        JOSHUA ¯T0002114.)
        The books composing the Pentateuch are properly but one book,
        the "Law of Moses," the "Book of the Law of Moses," the "Book of
        Moses," or, as the Jews designate it, the "Torah" or "Law." That
        in its present form it "proceeds from a single author is proved
        by its plan and aim, according to which its whole contents refer
        to the covenant concluded between Jehovah and his people, by the
        instrumentality of Moses, in such a way that everything before
        his time is perceived to be preparatory to this fact, and all
        the rest to be the development of it. Nevertheless, this unity
        has not been stamped upon it as a matter of necessity by the
        latest redactor: it has been there from the beginning, and is
        visible in the first plan and in the whole execution of the
        work.", Keil, Einl. i.d. A. T.
        A certain school of critics have set themselves to reconstruct
        the books of the Old Testament. By a process of "scientific
        study" they have discovered that the so-called historical books
        of the Old Testament are not history at all, but a miscellaneous
        collection of stories, the inventions of many different writers,
        patched together by a variety of editors! As regards the
        Pentateuch, they are not ashamed to attribute fraud, and even
        conspiracy, to its authors, who sought to find acceptance to
        their work which was composed partly in the age of Josiah, and
        partly in that of Ezra and Nehemiah, by giving it out to be the
        work of Moses! This is not the place to enter into the details
        of this controversy. We may say frankly, however, that we have
        no faith in this "higher criticism." It degrades the books of
        the Old Testament below the level of fallible human writings,
        and the arguments on which its speculations are built are
        altogether untenable.
        The evidences in favour of the Mosaic authorship of the
        Pentateuch are conclusive. We may thus state some of them
        briefly:
        (1.) These books profess to have been written by Moses in the
        name of God (Ex. 17:14; 24:3, 4, 7; 32:7-10, 30-34; 34:27; Lev.
        26:46; 27:34; Deut. 31:9, 24, 25).
        (2.) This also is the uniform and persistent testimony of the
        Jews of all sects in all ages and countries (comp. Josh. 8:31,
        32; 1 Kings 2:3; Jer. 7:22; Ezra 6:18; Neh. 8:1; Mal. 4:4; Matt.
        22:24; Acts 15:21).
        (3.) Our Lord plainly taught the Mosaic authorship of these
        books (Matt. 5:17, 18; 19:8; 22:31, 32; 23:2; Mark 10:9; 12:26;
        Luke 16:31; 20:37; 24:26, 27, 44; John 3:14; 5:45, 46, 47; 6:32,
        49; 7:19, 22). In the face of this fact, will any one venture to
        allege either that Christ was ignorant of the composition of the
        Bible, or that, knowing the true state of the case, he yet
        encouraged the people in the delusion they clung to?
        (4.) From the time of Joshua down to the time of Ezra there
        is, in the intermediate historical books, a constant reference
        to the Pentateuch as the "Book of the Law of Moses." This is a
        point of much importance, inasmuch as the critics deny that
        there is any such reference; and hence they deny the historical
        character of the Pentateuch. As regards the Passover, e.g., we
        find it frequently spoken of or alluded to in the historical
        books following the Pentateuch, showing that the "Law of Moses"
        was then certainly known. It was celebrated in the time of
        Joshua (Josh. 5:10, cf. 4:19), Hezekiah (2 Chr. 30), Josiah (2
        Kings 23; 2 Chr. 35), and Zerubbabel (Ezra 6:19-22), and is
        referred to in such passages as 2 Kings 23:22; 2 Chr. 35:18; 1
        Kings 9:25 ("three times in a year"); 2 Chr. 8:13. Similarly we
        might show frequent references to the Feast of Tabernacles and
        other Jewish institutions, although we do not admit that any
        valid argument can be drawn from the silence of Scripture in
        such a case. An examination of the following texts, 1 Kings 2:9;
        2 Kings 14:6; 2 Chr. 23:18; 25:4; 34:14; Ezra 3:2; 7:6; Dan.
        9:11, 13, will also plainly show that the "Law of Moses" was
        known during all these centuries.
        Granting that in the time of Moses there existed certain oral
        traditions or written records and documents which he was
        divinely led to make use of in his history, and that his writing
        was revised by inspired successors, this will fully account for
        certain peculiarities of expression which critics have called
        "anachronisms" and "contradictions," but in no way militates
        against the doctrine that Moses was the original author of the
        whole of the Pentateuch. It is not necessary for us to affirm
        that the whole is an original composition; but we affirm that
        the evidences clearly demonstrate that Moses was the author of
        those books which have come down to us bearing his name. The
        Pentateuch is certainly the basis and necessary preliminary of
        the whole of the Old Testament history and literature. (See
        DEUTERONOMY ¯T0001024.)
Bibliography Information
Easton, Matthew George. M.A., D.D., "Biblical Meaning for 'Pentateuch' Eastons Bible Dictionary".
bible-history.com - Eastons; 1897.

Copyright Information
© Easton's Bible Dictionary

Eastons Bible Dictionary Home
Bible History Online Home

Bible Encyclopedia (ISBE)
Online Bible (KJV)
Naves Topical Bible
Smith's Bible Dictionary
Easton's Bible Dictionary
Fausset's Bible Dictionary
Hitchcock's Bible Dictionary