Bible History Online Images & Resource Pages

Categories

Ancient Documents
Ancient Egypt
Ancient Greece
Ancient Israel
Ancient Near East
Ancient Other
Ancient Persia
Ancient Rome
Archaeology
Bible Animals
Bible Books
Bible Cities
Bible History
Bible Names A-G
Bible Names H-M
Bible Names N-Z
Bible Searches
Biblical Archaeology
Childrens Resources
Church History
Evolution & Science
Illustrated History
Images & Art
Intertestamental
Jesus
Languages
Manners & Customs
Maps & Geography
Messianic Prophecies
Museums
Mythology & Beliefs
People - Ancient Egypt
People - Ancient Greece
People - Ancient Near East
People - Ancient Rome
Rabbinical Works
Sites - Egypt
Sites - Israel
Sites - Jerusalem
Societies & Studies
Study Tools
Timelines & Charts
Weapons & Warfare
World History

May 24    Scripture

Bible History Online Submission Page
Bible History OnlineBible History Online Search
Bible History Online Sitemap
About Bible History OnlineBible History Online Help


Easton's Bible Dictionary

 

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z 


Luke, Gospel according to
        was written by Luke. He does not claim to have been an
        eye-witness of our Lord's ministry, but to have gone to the best
        sources of information within his reach, and to have written an
        orderly narrative of the facts (Luke 1:1-4). The authors of the
        first three Gospels, the synoptics, wrote independently of each
        other. Each wrote his independent narrative under the guidance
        of the Holy Spirit.
        Each writer has some things, both in matter and style,
        peculiar to himself, yet all the three have much in common.
        Luke's Gospel has been called "the Gospel of the nations, full
        of mercy and hope, assured to the world by the love of a
        suffering Saviour;" "the Gospel of the saintly life;" "the
        Gospel for the Greeks; the Gospel of the future; the Gospel of
        progressive Christianity, of the universality and gratuitousness
        of the gospel; the historic Gospel; the Gospel of Jesus as the
        good Physician and the Saviour of mankind;" the "Gospel of the
        Fatherhood of God and the brotherhood of man;" "the Gospel of
        womanhood;" "the Gospel of the outcast, of the Samaritan, the
        publican, the harlot, and the prodigal;" "the Gospel of
        tolerance." The main characteristic of this Gospel, as Farrar
        (Cambridge Bible, Luke, Introd.) remarks, is fitly expressed in
        the motto, "Who went about doing good, and healing all that were
        oppressed of the devil" (Acts 10:38; comp. Luke 4:18). Luke
        wrote for the "Hellenic world." This Gospel is indeed "rich and
        precious."
        "Out of a total of 1151 verses, Luke has 389 in common with
        Matthew and Mark, 176 in common with Matthew alone, 41 in common
        with Mark alone, leaving 544 peculiar to himself. In many
        instances all three use identical language." (See MATTHEW
        There are seventeen of our Lord's parables peculiar to this
        Gospel. (See List of Parables in Appendix.) Luke also records
        seven of our Lord's miracles which are omitted by Matthew and
        Mark. (See List of Miracles in Appendix.) The synoptical Gospels
        are related to each other after the following scheme. If the
        contents of each Gospel be represented by 100, then when
        compared this result is obtained:
        Mark has 7 peculiarities, 93 coincidences.
        Matthew 42 peculiarities, 58 coincidences.
        Luke 59 peculiarities, 41 coincidences.
        That is, thirteen-fourteenths of Mark, four-sevenths of Matthew,
        and two-fifths of Luke are taken up in describing the same
        things in very similar language.
        Luke's style is more finished and classical than that of
        Matthew and Mark. There is less in it of the Hebrew idiom. He
        uses a few Latin words (Luke 12:6; 7:41; 8:30; 11:33; 19:20),
        but no Syriac or Hebrew words except sikera, an exciting drink
        of the nature of wine, but not made of grapes (from Heb. shakar,
        "he is intoxicated", Lev. 10:9), probably palm wine.
        This Gospel contains twenty-eight distinct references to the
        Old Testament.
        The date of its composition is uncertain. It must have been
        written before the Acts, the date of the composition of which is
        generally fixed at about 63 or 64 A.D. This Gospel was written,
        therefore, probably about 60 or 63, when Luke may have been at
        Caesarea in attendance on Paul, who was then a prisoner. Others
        have conjectured that it was written at Rome during Paul's
        imprisonment there. But on this point no positive certainty can
        be attained.
        It is commonly supposed that Luke wrote under the direction,
        if not at the dictation of Paul. Many words and phrases are
        common to both; e.g., compare:
        Luke 4:22; with Col. 4:6.
        Luke 4:32; with 1 Cor. 2:4.
        Luke 6:36; with 2 Cor. 1:3.
        Luke 6:39; with Rom. 2:19.
        Luke 9:56; with 2 Cor. 10:8.
        Luke 10:8; with 1 Cor. 10:27.
        Luke 11:41; with Titus 1:15.
        Luke 18:1; with 2 Thess. 1:11.
        Luke 21:36; with Eph. 6:18.
        Luke 22:19, 20; with 1 Cor. 11:23-29.
        Luke 24:46; with Acts 17:3.
        Luke 24:34; with 1 Cor. 15:5.
Bibliography Information
Easton, Matthew George. M.A., D.D., "Biblical Meaning for 'Luke, Gospel according to' Eastons Bible Dictionary".
bible-history.com - Eastons; 1897.

Copyright Information
© Easton's Bible Dictionary

Eastons Bible Dictionary Home
Bible History Online Home

Bible Encyclopedia (ISBE)
Online Bible (KJV)
Naves Topical Bible
Smith's Bible Dictionary
Easton's Bible Dictionary
Fausset's Bible Dictionary
Hitchcock's Bible Dictionary