Bible History Online Images & Resource Pages

Categories

Ancient Documents
Ancient Egypt
Ancient Greece
Ancient Israel
Ancient Near East
Ancient Other
Ancient Persia
Ancient Rome
Archaeology
Bible Animals
Bible Books
Bible Cities
Bible History
Bible Names A-G
Bible Names H-M
Bible Names N-Z
Bible Searches
Biblical Archaeology
Childrens Resources
Church History
Evolution & Science
Illustrated History
Images & Art
Intertestamental
Jesus
Languages
Manners & Customs
Maps & Geography
Messianic Prophecies
Museums
Mythology & Beliefs
People - Ancient Egypt
People - Ancient Greece
People - Ancient Near East
People - Ancient Rome
Rabbinical Works
Sites - Egypt
Sites - Israel
Sites - Jerusalem
Societies & Studies
Study Tools
Timelines & Charts
Weapons & Warfare
World History

May 24    Scripture

Bible History Online Submission Page
Bible History OnlineBible History Online Search
Bible History Online Sitemap
About Bible History OnlineBible History Online Help


Easton's Bible Dictionary

 

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z 


Joshua, The Book of
        contains a history of the Israelites from the death of Moses to
        that of Joshua. It consists of three parts: (1.) The history of
        the conquest of the land (1-12). (2.) The allotment of the land
        to the different tribes, with the appointment of cities of
        refuge, the provision for the Levites (13-22), and the dismissal
        of the eastern tribes to their homes. This section has been
        compared to the Domesday Book of the Norman conquest. (3.) The
        farewell addresses of Joshua, with an account of his death (23,
        24).
        This book stands first in the second of the three sections,
        (1) the Law, (2) the Prophets, (3) the "other writings" =
        Hagiographa, into which the Jewish Church divided the Old
        Testament. There is every reason for concluding that the uniform
        tradition of the Jews is correct when they assign the authorship
        of the book to Joshua, all except the concluding section; the
        last verses (24:29-33) were added by some other hand.
        There are two difficulties connected with this book which have
        given rise to much discussion, (1.) The miracle of the standing
        still of the sun and moon on Gibeon. The record of it occurs in
        Joshua's impassioned prayer of faith, as quoted (Josh. 10:12-15)
        from the "Book of Jasher" (q.v.). There are many explanations
        given of these words. They need, however, present no difficulty
        if we believe in the possibility of God's miraculous
        interposition in behalf of his people. Whether it was caused by
        the refraction of the light, or how, we know not.
        (2.) Another difficulty arises out of the command given by God
        utterly to exterminate the Canaanites. "Shall not the Judge of
        all the earth do right?" It is enough that Joshua clearly knew
        that this was the will of God, who employs his terrible
        agencies, famine, pestilence, and war, in the righteous
        government of this world. The Canaanites had sunk into a state
        of immorality and corruption so foul and degrading that they had
        to be rooted out of the land with the edge of the sword. "The
        Israelites' sword, in its bloodiest executions, wrought a work
        of mercy for all the countries of the earth to the very end of
        the world."
        This book resembles the Acts of the Apostles in the number and
        variety of historical incidents it records, and in its many
        references to persons and places; and as in the latter case the
        epistles of Paul (see Paley's Horae Paul.) confirm its
        historical accuracy by their incidental allusions and
        "undesigned coincidences," so in the former modern discoveries
        confirm its historicity. The Amarna tablets (see ADONIZEDEC
        Dating from about B.C. 1480 down to the time of Joshua, and
        consisting of official communications from Amorite, Phoenician,
        and Philistine chiefs to the king of Egypt, they afford a
        glimpse into the actual condition of Israel prior to the
        Hebrew invasion, and illustrate and confirm the history of the
        conquest. A letter, also still extant, from a military officer,
        "master of the captains of Egypt," dating from near the end of
        the reign of Rameses II., gives a curious account of a journey,
        probably official, which he undertook through Israel as far
        north as to Aleppo, and an insight into the social condition of
        the country at that time. Among the things brought to light by
        this letter and the Amarna tablets is the state of confusion and
        decay that had now fallen on Egypt. The Egyptian garrisons that
        had held possession of Israel from the time of Thothmes III.,
        some two hundred years before, had now been withdrawn. The way
        was thus opened for the Hebrews. In the history of the conquest
        there is no mention of Joshua having encountered any Egyptian
        force. The tablets contain many appeals to the king of Egypt for
        help against the inroads of the Hebrews, but no help seems ever
        to have been sent. Is not this just such a state of things as
        might have been anticipated as the result of the disaster of the
        Exodus? In many points, as shown under various articles, the
        progress of the conquest is remarkably illustrated by the
        tablets. The value of modern discoveries in their relation to
        Old Testament history has been thus well described:
        "The difficulty of establishing the charge of lack of
        historical credibility, as against the testimony of the Old
        Testament, has of late years greatly increased. The outcome of
        recent excavations and explorations is altogether against it. As
        long as these books contained, in the main, the only known
        accounts of the events they mention, there was some plausibility
        in the theory that perhaps these accounts were written rather to
        teach moral lessons than to preserve an exact knowledge of
        events. It was easy to say in those times men had not the
        historic sense. But the recent discoveries touch the events
        recorded in the Bible at very many different points in many
        different generations, mentioning the same persons, countries,
        peoples, events that are mentioned in the Bible, and showing
        beyond question that these were strictly historic. The point is
        not that the discoveries confirm the correctness of the Biblical
        statements, though that is commonly the case, but that the
        discoveries show that the peoples of those ages had the historic
        sense, and, specifically, that the Biblical narratives they
        touch are narratives of actual occurrences."
Bibliography Information
Easton, Matthew George. M.A., D.D., "Biblical Meaning for 'Joshua, The Book of' Eastons Bible Dictionary".
bible-history.com - Eastons; 1897.

Copyright Information
© Easton's Bible Dictionary

Eastons Bible Dictionary Home
Bible History Online Home

Bible Encyclopedia (ISBE)
Online Bible (KJV)
Naves Topical Bible
Smith's Bible Dictionary
Easton's Bible Dictionary
Fausset's Bible Dictionary
Hitchcock's Bible Dictionary